<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The beauty of Creative Byline for editors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.creativebyline.com/2007/10/05/the-beauty-of-creative-byline-for-editors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.creativebyline.com/2007/10/05/the-beauty-of-creative-byline-for-editors/</link>
	<description>A blog for writers and publishers by Creative Byline</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:21:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karmen Kooyers</title>
		<link>http://blog.creativebyline.com/2007/10/05/the-beauty-of-creative-byline-for-editors/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karmen Kooyers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 18:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creativebyline.wordpress.com/2007/10/05/the-beauty-of-creative-byline-for-editors/#comment-34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One concern.  What I hear editors say most often is that they don&#039;t know what they&#039;re looking for, but they know it when they see it.  For instance, they don&#039;t think they&#039;re interested in fantasy, but then they read a fantasy manuscript that really grabs them. Would Karen Hesse&#039;s editor have ever known she wanted to publish a manuscript on the Dust Bowl before she read OUT OF THE DUST?  Highly unlikely.
Editors seem to be mostly looking for a &quot;voice&quot; that grabs them, far more than a particular kind of story.  How will that voice be defined or described through this process?  Perhaps editors will pick up on it through cover letters.  I do think this is a terrific idea.  In my particular situation, I write about jazz and would love to connect with editors who also love jazz.
I hope editors will remain open to reading new voices and not limit themselves too much to a particular style.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One concern.  What I hear editors say most often is that they don&#8217;t know what they&#8217;re looking for, but they know it when they see it.  For instance, they don&#8217;t think they&#8217;re interested in fantasy, but then they read a fantasy manuscript that really grabs them. Would Karen Hesse&#8217;s editor have ever known she wanted to publish a manuscript on the Dust Bowl before she read OUT OF THE DUST?  Highly unlikely.<br />
Editors seem to be mostly looking for a &#8220;voice&#8221; that grabs them, far more than a particular kind of story.  How will that voice be defined or described through this process?  Perhaps editors will pick up on it through cover letters.  I do think this is a terrific idea.  In my particular situation, I write about jazz and would love to connect with editors who also love jazz.<br />
I hope editors will remain open to reading new voices and not limit themselves too much to a particular style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

